Would you recommend this project? Use mock, and this is no problem. Indeed this is always bad behavior, the following change to config. Or the test-build is not done with Mock or the Fedora Build System "koji" if you follow the https: More projects by mheily View all. Perhaps the "redhat-rpm-config" package is not installed. Comment 13 Eric Radman
Uploader: | Voodoojas |
Date Added: | 25 May 2010 |
File Size: | 34.56 Mb |
Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
Downloads: | 49705 |
Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Package: libkqueue-dev (2.0.3-1.1 and others)
That's the wrong package for them. Comment 11 Eric Radman BTW, when building for reviews rawhide is the preferred platform. Attachments Terms of Use Add an attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
None of the arguments I've read so far put it so simply. I'll write him and ask if he'd like to create an official 1. Fix the summary as well. Are you still interested in to keep this review request alive? Comment 9 Eric Radman I think this package is starting to shape up - devel and static subpackages depend on the base package - Fix up the description a libkquwue - Install.
SlackBuilds Repository
Use mock, and this is no problem. One can get it also as a dependency when installing the "fedora-packager" package.
For the benefit of fellow developers, don't leave out any detail! Would you help us out by taking a second survey?
You're right, we don't have to override libkquee other variables.
Debian -- Details of package libkqueue-dev in sid
They are development related. Are you happy with your logging solution? The package has been updated to latest version. You shouldn't package libtool archive.
That worked perfectly, thanks. A user space implementation of the kqueue 2 kernel event notification mechanism libkqueue acts as a translator between the kevent structure and lib,queue native kernel facilities on Linux, Android, Solaris, and Windows. The macro doesn't add any value, does it? The script seems to handle that.
One is for an ignored read 2 result that is simply passed up to the caller: Initial efforts are focused on porting to the Linux 2. Comment 20 Eric Radman Comment 14 Eric Radman Comment 16 Alec Leamas Would you recommend this project?
Many things in the packaging guidelines are not in there just for fun, but with the goal of avoiding packaging pitfalls. However, the first step is to create those patches, not to create a new tarball.
Is the project reliable? Please respond to that. Chris Bailey Add support for kevent64 2 timers from Darwin. Basically, this motivation isn't enough IMHO. Browse Requests Reports Product Dashboard.
My tendency was to look at liboqueue RPMs, but they're not always good templates to follow.
No comments:
Post a Comment